<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google &#8220;Sandbox&#8221; is Real but not Definitive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/</link>
	<description>Making Money through Ethical Internet Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-12396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-12396</guid>
		<description>Let me note that - this was over a space of about 10 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me note that &#8211; this was over a space of about 10 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-12395</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I&#039;ve recently started running my own personal website design blog, based around me as a student designing websites. Anyway, I had posted an article about &quot;My top 5 website layouts&quot; about 2 days ago. I was averaging about 100 unique visitors per day, then suddenly, I get a jump to over 300 in one day.

I checked my results and it&#039;s down to this 1 article. So I searched google for &quot;top website layouts&quot; and there I was, ranging from 2nd to 6th position. I was bloody happy to say the least! 

I thought I&#039;d give it another search, just to see what has happened, and I&#039;ve totally disappeared. The only mention of it is a link to dzone. 

Very weird stuff. One thing to note, whenever I post a new blog, I add it to digg, dzone, propeller and about 3 other sites.

I&#039;m hoping it&#039;s the &quot;sandbox&quot; and google aren&#039;t messing me around :(

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently started running my own personal website design blog, based around me as a student designing websites. Anyway, I had posted an article about &#8220;My top 5 website layouts&#8221; about 2 days ago. I was averaging about 100 unique visitors per day, then suddenly, I get a jump to over 300 in one day.</p>
<p>I checked my results and it&#8217;s down to this 1 article. So I searched google for &#8220;top website layouts&#8221; and there I was, ranging from 2nd to 6th position. I was bloody happy to say the least! </p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d give it another search, just to see what has happened, and I&#8217;ve totally disappeared. The only mention of it is a link to dzone. </p>
<p>Very weird stuff. One thing to note, whenever I post a new blog, I add it to digg, dzone, propeller and about 3 other sites.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping it&#8217;s the &#8220;sandbox&#8221; and google aren&#8217;t messing me around <img src='http://www.ethicalim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markowe</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-8463</link>
		<dc:creator>markowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-8463</guid>
		<description>So, did you ever get back in the rankings for those keywords you mentioned?

I have just had the same thing happen - a site that was getting good traffic just suddenly disappearing from the SERPS altogether, real bummer - an eBay listings site, maybe Google doesn&#039;t like them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, did you ever get back in the rankings for those keywords you mentioned?</p>
<p>I have just had the same thing happen &#8211; a site that was getting good traffic just suddenly disappearing from the SERPS altogether, real bummer &#8211; an eBay listings site, maybe Google doesn&#8217;t like them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Altaf</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-4418</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Altaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-4418</guid>
		<description>I liked the info by Brent H.
I have a few sites and blogs. I experimented with SEO and new contents. All my sites were earlier ranked well, Then I found all on a sudden, it is gone down, or even some are not in SERPS.
Only difference, I made a lot of links to my own sites with KW/ Ph, that were copied to my all sites equally.
Does that matter to Google or other SE?
Also I am not making any good money with optimization either. Any good suggestions to me Brent pls?
Aslo how to know the traffic/rank of my blogs?
Thanks &amp; reagrds,
Dr Altaf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the info by Brent H.<br />
I have a few sites and blogs. I experimented with SEO and new contents. All my sites were earlier ranked well, Then I found all on a sudden, it is gone down, or even some are not in SERPS.<br />
Only difference, I made a lot of links to my own sites with KW/ Ph, that were copied to my all sites equally.<br />
Does that matter to Google or other SE?<br />
Also I am not making any good money with optimization either. Any good suggestions to me Brent pls?<br />
Aslo how to know the traffic/rank of my blogs?<br />
Thanks &amp; reagrds,<br />
Dr Altaf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh &amp; Brent,

I saw the clickthroughs coming in to my page from Brent Crouch&#039;s link above (thanks Brent!), so I thought I&#039;d drop by.

I want to clarify a few things...

Significant content changes *will* affect rankings - but the key here is &quot;significant&quot;.

Recently, we redeveloped a client&#039;s site, yet maintained the site structure, and largely maintained the same content... But we saw rankings drop 50-100 (or often more) places down the rankings for about 2 months.

Again, this was a *significant* redevelopment - although site structure was maintained, and page content was kept very similar, title tag structures etc changed significantly.

After about 2 months, the site started ranking well for the &quot;new&quot; keywords, and rankings improved for the old keywords too (not quite to where they were previously - but much higher than where they were).

Brent [Crouch] - by all means, optimise your sales page for conversions... Don&#039;t worry about making those sort of tweaks. 

HOWEVER - Chances are, you&#039;d have better success with SEO if you had a whole series of lead-gen pages (valuable articles, linkbait etc) that you focussed on ranking, and drove that traffic into your electronic products page.

In my humble opinion... Pages can&#039;t be optimised for both conversion and SEO - it generally requires compromising one or the other... and when you compromise, it&#039;s not &quot;optimisation&quot;.

Re: the &quot;dropped from Google&quot; article (linked above) I was referring to sites disappearing when no significant changes were made to the site.

This is a phenomena where sites disappear and reappear in Google&#039;s SERPs after 48 hours - which I suspect means it&#039;s simply a data centre issue (i.e. - Google is changing the data centre they&#039;re using or something similar).

Re: the significance content changes in general - if read up about the history of the Hilltop Algorithm if you haven&#039;t read about it already. It shows (if you collect enough data on ranking factors) why you end up with two different conflicting sets of data - one where on-page changes are very important, and one where on-page changes are largely unimportant.

(In the data I&#039;ve pulled together, I also found some conflicting data on whether Domain Links or Page Links were more important... again, this could be traffic affecting how the algorithm is applied... but that&#039;s another story...)

Anyway - rabbiting on enough here. 

I think you both have my email address now - so don&#039;t be strangers.

Brent (the other one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh &amp; Brent,</p>
<p>I saw the clickthroughs coming in to my page from Brent Crouch&#8217;s link above (thanks Brent!), so I thought I&#8217;d drop by.</p>
<p>I want to clarify a few things&#8230;</p>
<p>Significant content changes *will* affect rankings &#8211; but the key here is &#8220;significant&#8221;.</p>
<p>Recently, we redeveloped a client&#8217;s site, yet maintained the site structure, and largely maintained the same content&#8230; But we saw rankings drop 50-100 (or often more) places down the rankings for about 2 months.</p>
<p>Again, this was a *significant* redevelopment &#8211; although site structure was maintained, and page content was kept very similar, title tag structures etc changed significantly.</p>
<p>After about 2 months, the site started ranking well for the &#8220;new&#8221; keywords, and rankings improved for the old keywords too (not quite to where they were previously &#8211; but much higher than where they were).</p>
<p>Brent [Crouch] &#8211; by all means, optimise your sales page for conversions&#8230; Don&#8217;t worry about making those sort of tweaks. </p>
<p>HOWEVER &#8211; Chances are, you&#8217;d have better success with SEO if you had a whole series of lead-gen pages (valuable articles, linkbait etc) that you focussed on ranking, and drove that traffic into your electronic products page.</p>
<p>In my humble opinion&#8230; Pages can&#8217;t be optimised for both conversion and SEO &#8211; it generally requires compromising one or the other&#8230; and when you compromise, it&#8217;s not &#8220;optimisation&#8221;.</p>
<p>Re: the &#8220;dropped from Google&#8221; article (linked above) I was referring to sites disappearing when no significant changes were made to the site.</p>
<p>This is a phenomena where sites disappear and reappear in Google&#8217;s SERPs after 48 hours &#8211; which I suspect means it&#8217;s simply a data centre issue (i.e. &#8211; Google is changing the data centre they&#8217;re using or something similar).</p>
<p>Re: the significance content changes in general &#8211; if read up about the history of the Hilltop Algorithm if you haven&#8217;t read about it already. It shows (if you collect enough data on ranking factors) why you end up with two different conflicting sets of data &#8211; one where on-page changes are very important, and one where on-page changes are largely unimportant.</p>
<p>(In the data I&#8217;ve pulled together, I also found some conflicting data on whether Domain Links or Page Links were more important&#8230; again, this could be traffic affecting how the algorithm is applied&#8230; but that&#8217;s another story&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; rabbiting on enough here. </p>
<p>I think you both have my email address now &#8211; so don&#8217;t be strangers.</p>
<p>Brent (the other one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3902</guid>
		<description>Hey Brent,

Just replied to your ticket.

Yeah, as far as SERP rankings go, I believe several years ago the on-page factors played a much bigger role than they do today. Of course the content is looked at, but I update pages quite frequently and very rarely see it directly contribute to changes in rankings.

So while I wont&#039; say it &quot;WON&#039;T&quot; effect anything, I will say it&#039;s unlikely.

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brent,</p>
<p>Just replied to your ticket.</p>
<p>Yeah, as far as SERP rankings go, I believe several years ago the on-page factors played a much bigger role than they do today. Of course the content is looked at, but I update pages quite frequently and very rarely see it directly contribute to changes in rankings.</p>
<p>So while I wont&#8217; say it &#8220;WON&#8217;T&#8221; effect anything, I will say it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>&quot;but from my own experiences in the past year or so it just seems like content tweaks donâ€™t cause much to happen.&quot;

That is good to know.  I&#039;ve got a site that is doing very well in the search engines.  I use the site to sell a digital product.  I&#039;ve been wanting to &quot;tweak&quot; the page some to try and raise my conversion rate.  I have been very reluctant to do so, because I don&#039;t want to screw with my rankings.

Since you haven&#039;t seen much of an affect from doing this, I think I&#039;ll give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but from my own experiences in the past year or so it just seems like content tweaks donâ€™t cause much to happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is good to know.  I&#8217;ve got a site that is doing very well in the search engines.  I use the site to sell a digital product.  I&#8217;ve been wanting to &#8220;tweak&#8221; the page some to try and raise my conversion rate.  I have been very reluctant to do so, because I don&#8217;t want to screw with my rankings.</p>
<p>Since you haven&#8217;t seen much of an affect from doing this, I think I&#8217;ll give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3896</guid>
		<description>Hi Brent, 

Thanks for the recommendation. I&#039;m not much of a believer in content changes affecting your SERPS these days. That&#039;s not to say I&#039;m right and he&#039;s wrong, but from my own experiences in the past year or so it just seems like content tweaks don&#039;t cause much to happen.

P.S. I did receive your email and I&#039;ll get back to you on that sometime today :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brent, </p>
<p>Thanks for the recommendation. I&#8217;m not much of a believer in content changes affecting your SERPS these days. That&#8217;s not to say I&#8217;m right and he&#8217;s wrong, but from my own experiences in the past year or so it just seems like content tweaks don&#8217;t cause much to happen.</p>
<p>P.S. I did receive your email and I&#8217;ll get back to you on that sometime today <img src='http://www.ethicalim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3891</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3891</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh,

Brent Hogdson wrote a post about what to do if your site mysteriously disappears for your top keywords.  I was a commenter to this post because I was experiencing this issue at the time he wrote the post.

I&#039;m not sure if what he described as a &quot;data update&quot; applies to your circumstances or not.  Luckily, in my situation it did and my rankings came back within a few days.

One of the things Brent mentioned to me was a lot of people start updating and making changes to their site when their rankings disappear.  What would have been a temporary loss of rankings becomes permanent  because of all the &quot;tweaking&quot; they do to the site during the &quot;data update&quot;.

It&#039;s a good post that is worth reading.

http://www.brenthodgson.com/marketing-case-studies/what-to-do-if-your-site-is-dropped-from-google.php

Good Luck,

Brent Crouch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>Brent Hogdson wrote a post about what to do if your site mysteriously disappears for your top keywords.  I was a commenter to this post because I was experiencing this issue at the time he wrote the post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if what he described as a &#8220;data update&#8221; applies to your circumstances or not.  Luckily, in my situation it did and my rankings came back within a few days.</p>
<p>One of the things Brent mentioned to me was a lot of people start updating and making changes to their site when their rankings disappear.  What would have been a temporary loss of rankings becomes permanent  because of all the &#8220;tweaking&#8221; they do to the site during the &#8220;data update&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good post that is worth reading.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brenthodgson.com/marketing-case-studies/what-to-do-if-your-site-is-dropped-from-google.php">http://www.brenthodgson.com/marketing-case-studies/what-to-do-if-your-site-is-dropped-from-google.php</a></p>
<p>Good Luck,</p>
<p>Brent Crouch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durrob</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3744</link>
		<dc:creator>durrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/the-google-sandbox-is-real-but-not-definitive/#comment-3744</guid>
		<description>My website was a month old, and getting 400-700 page views a day, then one day all of a sudden 25 page views a day, all my links are quality links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My website was a month old, and getting 400-700 page views a day, then one day all of a sudden 25 page views a day, all my links are quality links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

