<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Eliminates their Supplemental Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/</link>
	<description>Making Money through Ethical Internet Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is a pretty big company as well and they certainly have issues ;)

I haven&#039;t seen much a change with any of my article sites. They are pretty good quality sites, but any article directory will have low PR pages. EzineArticles even has pages that were in Google hell.

From what I&#039;ve gathered, there really hasn&#039;t been much change in their rankings. I think they just decided to take the &quot;supplemental index&quot; title off of it. I&#039;d imagine most of the pages that were in the sups get the same traffic as they did before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is a pretty big company as well and they certainly have issues <img src='http://www.ethicalim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen much a change with any of my article sites. They are pretty good quality sites, but any article directory will have low PR pages. EzineArticles even has pages that were in Google hell.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve gathered, there really hasn&#8217;t been much change in their rankings. I think they just decided to take the &#8220;supplemental index&#8221; title off of it. I&#8217;d imagine most of the pages that were in the sups get the same traffic as they did before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalim.com/search-engine-optimization/google-eliminates-their-supplemental-index/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m sure Google knows what they are doing.. pretty big company ;) but it&#039;s good they cleared up the confusion with supplemental results. I think they still exist to some degree for things like duplicate content. Apparently it&#039;s been changed for a bit now and just announced so if you&#039;re up to speed with things it shouldn&#039;t hurt your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m sure Google knows what they are doing.. pretty big company <img src='http://www.ethicalim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but it&#8217;s good they cleared up the confusion with supplemental results. I think they still exist to some degree for things like duplicate content. Apparently it&#8217;s been changed for a bit now and just announced so if you&#8217;re up to speed with things it shouldn&#8217;t hurt your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
