This is a very useful time, effort and money saver tip.

Thanks again!

You might want to make sure that people understand that split testing should be for small or inceremntal changes.

For instance, two identical pages with different headlines and everything else the same. Or if you’re going to use graphics, thry not to alter the text at all so you know that it really was the graphics that made the difference.

While this kind of testing can seem really boring and tedious, it’s how science is done and that’s a good precedent to follow.

Also, make sure you run your test over a statistically significan’t period. When we do organic search engine optimization for a client, they start emailing us within a couple days wanting to know why they aren’t on the first page of Google.

They impluse is to start altering thing immediately to try to improve results. Yet, we tell the client that we need to give the SEO at least a month before we do any tinkering to get significan’t data to analyze.

You need to do the same thing with your split testing. This must be a long-term process.

I’ve seen your: “Learn from one of the most Elite Article Marketers and Start Dominating your Niches with Effective Article Marketing!”

and thought to make my version:
“Discover the Technique an Elite Article Marketer uses. Dominating Niches with Effective Article Marketing Guaranteed!”

“learn’ might suggest school/boring etc. while “discover” has only great connotations…

Here is one tip:

Multivariate test -
Cons: you need much more traffic than with A/B test to get some statistically valid data with Multivariate test.
Pros: Testing different more than one change is useful, but it is not the true power of Multivariate test. The true power of it is testing different factors combined. For example, you might discover that the certain headline with the certain opening paragraph are the best converting combination, while other headlines and paragraphs when tested separately give the same or better results than the one that wins (when combined).